I picked this Starbucks ad (Starbucks slogan on the left
side of the page: The world has a pause button) because I thought I could
immediately understand what the advertisers were trying to communicate in the
ad -- in terms of trying to persuade ad viewers to go to Starbucks -- with
co-workers or friends -- and have a cup of coffee -- and some pastries -- because
when you go to Starbucks, you are doing more than just having a cup of
coffee. The slogans in the photo ad on
the lower right are: You & Starbucks // It’s bigger than coffee.
I drink coffee myself and know how good it can make you feel
and lift you up when you need a lift -- to get work done. I can also relate to the represented
participants in terms of having a full or even heavy work load and needing to
pause every once in a while for a caffeine and sugar fix (Starbucks slogan in
the ad: "The world has a pause button"). The Starbucks ad is obviously communicating
to the viewer that if you want to relax, enjoy yourself, relate and communicate
with other people around you -- just as the represented participants are doing
in this photo ad -- particularly your co-workers or friends -- go to
Starbucks! The ad does make a lot of
claims (symbolically and pictorially) and uses the represented participants and
Starbucks coffee and pastry objects to try to persuade the viewer that
Starbucks is a great place to go to feel good (Starbucks slogans in the ad:
"You & Starbucks"//"It's bigger than coffee").
2) Connections I made to the readings or videos:
As is pointed out in the Marshall McLuhan video, the medium is not neutral and has an effect on the individual. The medium used by the communicator or advertiser is significant – even critical – by itself – in terms of what kind of effects it can have on the viewer -- in terms of getting him or her to think something or do something in response to given medium. (The medium is the message). According to McLuhan, the medium affects our thinking and how we actually perceive the message and the world around us -- and how we experience the world as well. I know that experts study these concepts, but I would like to learn a lot more how media affects individuals viewing the particular medium. I am sure every advertiser wants to know that as well – and spend big bucks doing just that!
The Starbucks photo ad is (obviously) trying to get the viewer to want to go to Starbucks and drink coffee and eat pastries. The photo ad is utilizing various advertising techniques to persuade the viewer to do something or, at least, think something, namely, that Starbucks is a great place to pause and relax and have a cup of coffee. The photo ad is trying to demonstrate to the viewer (through various symbols) that it is worth it to the represented participants (See, they are happy, smiling, and chatting!) to go to Starbucks and spend their hard-earned money to consume this product – and even do their work there as well. These represented participants are cool. Therefore, it will be worth it to the viewer to do exactly the same thing – because It’s You & Starbucks and It’s bigger than coffee!
In my opinion, the ad applied a number of principles
discussed by Kress and van Leeuwen (2006).
These include:
These include:
1) the concept of salience because the most “salient”
element in the Starbucks photo ad is a pair of hands and forearms that are
alone visible of the represented participant (closest to the viewer) and that
receive the greatest amount of light -- on the hands -- with the right hand
securely gripping a cup of coffee -- as if it were the greatest thing a person
could grip!).
2) The image above is an offer because the represented
participants are offered to the viewer as items of information. The represented participants are not looking
at the viewer nor are they demanding anything of the viewer. (p. 119). The image shown is a close-up. The represented participants are depicted as
close to the viewer (p. 124). For
example, person 1 (closest to us on the left) is at close personal distance
(intimate relationship distance). We
could touch person 1 if we were there.
3) The coffee cup
objects also are shown at close distance – as if the viewer is engaged with
these objects and as if the viewer were or could be eating the food and
drinking the coffee (p. 127). The coffee
cup objects are represented as if within the viewer’s reach, but not as
actually used (the coffee mugs are full).
The objects are represented at a slight upward angle but not a steep
one.
4) The image is
subjective (not objective) because as Kress and van Leeuwen state: “the viewer
can see what there is to see only from a particular [Starbucks] point of
view" (p. 130). The viewer (in the
photo above) is “‘being subjected to something or someone’“(p. 131).
5) The photo ad above is from a frontal point of view (p.
135). The image-producer (and the
viewer) are involved with the represented participants (p. 136). The picture is at eye-level (and so there
does not appear to be power differences involved). This could be the viewer sitting at this
table interacting with these represented participants (or similar
participants).
6) Applying the given
and new (or left and right concept) to the Starbucks ad: the represented
participants sit on the left side of the ad and feel better (the given). (Kress and van Leeuwen (2006) state that “the
left side is the side of the already given, something the reader is assumed to
know already, as part of the culture...” (p. 180)). So the underlying meaning of this ad is that
it is already given that the represented participants (on the left side of the
ad) who come to Starbucks will be happy and feel good, and that this message is
something the viewer already knows or should know in our culture (Kress and Van
Leeuwen, p. 181). That the world has a
pause button is a given and so is placed on the left side of the ad.\
7) The Starbucks photo ad (still applying Kress and Van
Leeuwen) “makes significant use of the horizontal axis, positioning some of
their elements left, and other, different ones right of centre” (p.
180-181). It is not accidental that no
one is sitting on the right side of the first table (closest to the
viewer). The reason is that (as Kress
and Van Leeuwen point out), it is not yet determined that the viewer of the ad
will come to Starbucks and sit at a table and have coffee (“new elements are
placed on the right and “for something to be New means that it is presented as
something which is not yet known, or perhaps not yet agreed upon by the viewer,
hence as something to which the viewer must pay special attention” (p.
181)).
So applying the New-right concept to the Starbucks ad, it is
not yet known if the viewer of the ad will agree with the slogans placed in the
lower right of the ad (You & Starbucks, and It’s bigger than coffee). As Kress and Van Leeuwen further state:
“Broadly speaking, the meaning of the New is therefore ‘problematic’,
‘contestable’, ‘the information “at issue” ‘, while the Given is presented as
commonsensical, self-evident” (p. 181). So (in this ad) the right side of the
table remains vacant (until the viewer decides to come to Starbucks and take a
seat at the table and have his/her cup of coffee). Interestingly, at the second table (towards
the top right of the photo), we see a male (late 20s) (we can only see his
face) sitting on the right, but the viewer does not or cannot see him drinking
coffee). Perhaps he is symbolic of the
New person who has not yet made up his mind -- whether it is him &
Starbucks. Yet, he is sitting in
Starbucks – and it could be only because he is with his friends – and he is
looking at his friends – so “It’s bigger than coffee” (quoting the Starbucks
slogan placed in the lower right) – meaning that the Starbucks experience
transcends coffee!
3) What I learned from this activity:
I learned that even though I thought I knew what was going
on in the photo ad, I still had to analyze and deconstruct it to see all the
elements. I am new at this so I am sure
that there are other ad symbols that I missed.
I realize that everything (I mean everything) is positioned in the ad to
convey a certain message. The advertisers
are using a language of symbols that I need to learn in order to fully
deconstruct these advertisements and to understand the real underlying messages
of visual media. I also learned that a
number of the concepts in Kress and van Leeuwen (2006) can be applied to this
photo ad.
References
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The
grammar of visual design. London and
New York: Routledge.
grammar of visual design. London and
New York: Routledge.
Rudenko, A. (2011, March 9). Starbucks Added Green Tones to
One of its UK Stores and Launched
International ‘Anniversary’ Ad Campaign. Retrieved from
http://popsop.com/2011/03/starbucks-
added-green-tones-to-one-of-its-uk-stores-and-launched-
international-%E2%80%98anniversary
%E2%80%99-ad-campaign/
One of its UK Stores and Launched
International ‘Anniversary’ Ad Campaign. Retrieved from
http://popsop.com/2011/03/starbucks-
added-green-tones-to-one-of-its-uk-stores-and-launched-
international-%E2%80%98anniversary
%E2%80%99-ad-campaign/
No comments:
Post a Comment